Romans 14:5 Meaning Explained

Q: What days does Romans 14:5 refer to?

The days in Romans 14:5 most likely refer to Jewish fasting days (Monday and Thursday were traditional fast days) or ceremonial feast days, not the weekly Sabbath. The context links 'esteeming days' directly to eating practices, suggesting fasting days are in view.

Some questions are matters of opinion. Some are not. Paul wrote Romans 14 to address disputes about food and fasting days, the kind of personal practices where sincere believers may differ. He called these "doubtful disputations." The Ten Commandments, written by God's own finger on stone, do not belong in this category.

The context links "esteeming days" directly to eating practices, suggesting Jewish fasting days are in view. Paul would not place a commandment from Sinai into the realm of optional personal preference. If the Fourth Commandment were negotiable, so would be the sixth and seventh.

The Verse in Context

"One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind."

Romans 14:5

Isolated from context, this verse appears to make all days equal. But what is Paul actually discussing? The surrounding verses reveal the topic:

"Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs."

Romans 14:1-2

Paul addresses "doubtful disputations," matters where Scripture does not give explicit commands. The immediate context links "esteeming days" to eating practices:

"He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks."

Romans 14:6

The connection between "regarding days" and "eating" suggests fasting days are in view, not the weekly Sabbath.

What Days Are Discussed?

Several types of days could be under discussion in Romans 14:

Possible Days in View

Jewish fasting days: Pharisees fasted Monday and Thursday (Luke 18:12)
Ceremonial feast days: Annual festivals that some Jewish Christians still observed
Personal devotional days: Days individuals chose for special religious observance

None of these categories includes the weekly seventh-day Sabbath, which is explicitly commanded in the Ten Commandments. The Sabbath is not a matter of personal preference or tradition. It is a direct command from God, written by His own finger on stone (Exodus 31:18).

Disputable Matters vs. Divine Commands

Romans 14 concerns matters where Christians may legitimately differ. Paul explicitly labels these as "doubtful disputations" (verse 1). The Ten Commandments do not fall into this category.

Disputable Matters (Romans 14)

Eating meat vs. vegetables
Observing fasting days
Drinking wine vs. abstaining
Personal devotional practices

Divine Commands

The Ten Commandments
Weekly seventh-day Sabbath
Written by God's finger
Never called "disputable"

Key distinction: Paul would not place a commandment written by God's own finger into the category of "doubtful disputations." To do so would undermine the moral law itself. If the Fourth Commandment is optional, why not the sixth ("Thou shalt not kill") or the seventh ("Thou shalt not commit adultery")?

Paul's Own Practice

If Paul believed any day of worship was acceptable, why did he consistently keep the Sabbath?

His manner: "As his manner was, [he] went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures" (Acts 17:2)
Gentiles invited: "The Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath" (Acts 13:42)
Regular practice: "He reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks" (Acts 18:4)

Paul met with Gentile believers on the Sabbath. If any day was acceptable, why did he not meet with them on Sunday? His practice reveals his belief: the Sabbath commandment remained in force.

Paul would not contradict his own consistent practice by teaching that the Sabbath was merely a matter of personal opinion.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Romans 14:5 abolish the Sabbath?

No. Romans 14:5 addresses disputable matters of personal conviction, not the Ten Commandments. The context discusses eating practices and fasting days, not the weekly Sabbath. Paul would not place God's explicit commandment in the category of optional personal opinion.

What is the context of Romans 14:5?

Romans 14 addresses disputes between Jewish and Gentile Christians over food (vegetarianism vs. meat-eating) and the observance of Jewish fasting days. The chapter concerns "doubtful disputations" (verse 1), matters where Scripture gives no explicit command.

What days does Romans 14:5 refer to?

The days most likely refer to Jewish fasting days (Monday and Thursday were traditional fast days) or ceremonial feast days, not the weekly Sabbath. The context links "esteeming days" directly to eating practices, suggesting fasting days are in view.

Did Paul teach against the Sabbath?

No. Paul kept the Sabbath throughout his ministry. Acts records that it was his "manner" to attend synagogue on the Sabbath (Acts 17:2). He met with Gentile believers on the Sabbath and reasoned "every sabbath" in the synagogue (Acts 18:4).

Go Deeper

Related Objections

Colossians 2:16 Explained — Another commonly misused passage
Full Romans 14:5 Response — Complete scholarly analysis
Objection Handler — Quick responses by verse

Full Chapters

Chapter 2: The Commandment They Changed
Appendix B: Common Objections Answered — 22 objections addressed

Interactive Studies

Law Types Decoder — Moral vs. ceremonial law
Sabbath vs Sunday — Complete comparison

Enter the Rest

The Sabbath was made for you.

Begin Get My Copy